The Visibility score is the main number in Rank Prompt:
Out of every AI answer we collected, the share that named your brand.
It is always a percentage of answers: "HubSpot is named in 18% of AI answers".
Each answer is one prompt asked on one AI platform in one report. The score divides the answers that name your brand by every answer collected:
Visibility score = answers that name your brand ÷ every answer collectedExample:
You track 20 prompts on 3 AI platforms: that's 60 answers per run
18 of those answers name your brand
Your Visibility score is 18 ÷ 60 = 30%
On the Visibility pages, the card under the score shows the same count, for example "18 of 60 answers". Adding AI platforms adds answers: up to 3 AI platforms cost 1 credit per prompt, 4 to 6 cost 2, all 7 cost 3 (see How credits work).
An answer names your brand when it names your brand or one of its aliases: other names or spellings AI answers use for you (a product name, an abbreviation such as "KW" for Keller Williams). Add aliases in Brand settings > Aliases and categories. If an AI platform names you under a name Rank Prompt listed as a competitor, mark it My brand (this is us) on the competitor and your past reports are recounted (see Competitors analysis).
Every answer counts the same, whichever AI platform gave it:
Prompt: "Best CRM for a small sales team"
ChatGPT: names your brand, 2nd ✓
Perplexity: names your brand, 1st ✓
AI Mode: doesn't name it ✗
Claude: names your brand, 3rd ✓
3 of 4 answers = 75% for this promptPick one AI platform in the AI platforms filter to see its score alone, or several to see them together.
Every answer counts the same, so a category with more prompts weighs more in your overall score:
Products: 10 answers, 8 name you = 80%
Services: 5 answers, 2 name you = 40%
Industry: 5 answers, 3 name you = 60%
Overall: (8 + 2 + 3) ÷ (10 + 5 + 5) = 13 ÷ 20 = 65%Unfinished reports: a report that didn't finish keeps the answers it saved as partial results, and they don't count in the score or its charts
Other time frames and reports: the score only reads the reports, dates, categories and AI platforms in your filters
On a report's Summary tab, Visibility with All markets counts every answer of the latest run in all its markets together, so a market with more prompts or AI platforms weighs more. The Visibility pages read a report you pick in the Reports in view filter the same way, so the two match.
Place | What it shows |
|---|---|
Visibility > Overview | Your score for the reports in the filters, with its tier, and by AI platform and category |
A report's page | The report's Visibility score, with its count of answers, next to its Citation share |
Reports | Each report's score on its latest run |
A report's page | The latest run on Summary, each run in History, the line on Trends |
Visibility > Prompts | Each prompt's and each category's visibility |
Visibility > Trends | The score run after run |
The app labels every score with one of three tiers, and the same bands color the score everywhere:
Tier | Score | What the app says |
|---|---|---|
Strong | 50% or more | When people ask about the category, AI platforms name and cite your brand regularly |
Moderate | 25% to under 50% | Your brand shows up for some prompts, with real room to grow |
Emerging | Under 25% | There is a wide opening to get AI platforms to name your brand |
The colors add one more step: red under 5%, yellow from 5% to under 25%, blue from 25% to under 50%, green from 50%.
Scores tend to run low: many brands start in single digits. So judge yours against your competitors and against your own trend, more than against a fixed number:
Against competitors: your share of voice on Visibility > Competitors shows whether rivals are named more often than you
Against yourself: a Scheduled Report shows whether you're climbing, run after run
By prompt type: prompts that mention your brand by name (type Brand) should almost always get answers that name you; broad category prompts are harder
Visibility by platform on the Overview breaks your score down by AI platform. The same prompt can name you on one and miss you on another, because each AI platform builds its answers its own way: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Muse and Perplexity often search the web before answering, each picks and ranks its sources differently, and each draws on its own training.
When you're strong on one AI platform and weak on another:
Filter Visibility > Prompts to the weak AI platform and open the answers that miss you: which brands do they name?
Check Sources > Citations with the same AI platform filter: which sites does it cite?
Check Visibility > Fan-outs: what did it search before answering? Google AI Mode (AI Overviews) doesn't report its searches.
Get your brand onto the pages and searches that AI platform relies on
You published or updated content that answers your prompts
Sites the AI platforms cite started to mention you
A competitor dropped out of the answers
Competitors published better content or earned more mentions
The AI platforms changed how they answer
Your pages went out of date
You added harder, broader prompts
Nothing changed much in your space
Good news if your score is high, a signal to act if it's low
Update your best pages: keep facts, prices and comparisons current
Answer your prompts directly: a page that answers a prompt in its own words is easier to cite
Link your topics together: help AI platforms see what your site covers
Get mentioned where AI looks: the sites in Sources > Citations are your outreach list
Study the prompts that miss you on Visibility > Prompts
Study who is named instead on Visibility > Competitors
Build complete guides on the topics you want to own
Keep publishing and track the effect with a Scheduled Report
The report's How to fix your results tab turns this into tasks for one report (Show me what to fix, 1 credit).
Metric | What it means |
|---|---|
Visibility score | Out of every AI answer collected, the share that named your brand |
Best rank / Answer position | Where your brand sits in an answer that names it (1 is first) |
Share of voice | Of all the times AI named you or a competitor, the share that was you |
You could have:
A high score and a low place: named often, but rarely first
A low score and a high place: named rarely, but first when you are
The goal: named often, near the top
AI answers vary from run to run. Look at:
The trend over several runs
Month over month changes
The effect of specific things you did
When you compare two periods, keep:
The same prompts
The same AI platforms
The same markets
In mind any prompts you added
Concept | Key point |
|---|---|
Definition | Out of every AI answer collected, the share that named your brand |
Tiers | Strong from 50%, Moderate from 25%, Emerging under 25% |
Improving | Content that answers your prompts, mentions on the sites AI cites |
Tracking | A Scheduled Report and Visibility > Trends |
AI platforms | Each answers its own way; compare them to find where to work |
See which prompts name you and which miss you
Study the competitors named instead of you
Track your trend to measure improvement
Email [email protected] and I'll help.